Pareto Chart and Pareto Analysis: Complete Guide
Quality Advisor
A free online reference for statistical process control, process capability analysis, measurement systems analysis,
control chart interpretation, and other quality metrics.
SPC DEMO
Minimize Production Costs, Quickly Detect Issues, and Optimize Your Product Quality
Don’t miss out! Book a demo of our specialized SPC software and unlock immediate improvements in your processes.
- Quality Advisor
- Data Collection Tools
- Data Analysis Tools
- Formulas and Tables
- Glossary
- Additional Resources
Pareto diagram
What is it?
A Pareto diagram is a simple bar chart that ranks related measures in decreasing order of occurrence. The principle was developed by Vilfredo Pareto, an Italian economist and sociologist who conducted a study in Europe in the early 1900s on wealth and poverty. He found that wealth was concentrated in the hands of the few and poverty in the hands of the many. The principle is based on the unequal distribution of things in the universe. It is the law of the “significant few versus the trivial many.” The significant few things will generally make up 80% of the whole, while the trivial many will make up about 20%.
The purpose of a Pareto diagram is to separate the significant aspects of a problem from the trivial ones. By graphically separating the aspects of a problem, a team will know where to direct its improvement efforts. Reducing the largest bars identified in the diagram will do more for overall improvement than reducing the smaller ones.
There are two ways to analyze Pareto data depending on what you want to know:
Counts Pareto: Use this type of Pareto analysis to learn which category occurs most often, you will need to do a counts Pareto diagram. To create a counts Pareto, you will need to know the categories and how often each occurred.
Cost Pareto: Use this type of Pareto analysis if you want to know which category of problem is the most expensive in terms of some cost. A cost Pareto provides more details about the impact of a specific category, than a count Pareto can. For example, suppose you have 50 occurrences of one problem and 3 occurrences of another. Based on a count Pareto, you would be likely to tackle the problem that occurred 50 times first. However, suppose the problem that occurred 50 times costs only $.50 per occurrence ($25 total) and the problem that occurs 3 times costs $50 each time ($150 total). Based on the cost Pareto, you may want to tackle the more expensive problem first. To create a cost Pareto, you will need to know the categories, how often each occurred, and a cost for each category.
What does it look like?
An example of a counts Pareto diagram is shown below.
When is it used?
Use a Pareto diagram when you can answer “yes” to both these questions:
- Can data be arranged into categories?
- Is the rank of each category important?
Getting the most
Despite its simplicity, Pareto analysis is one of the most powerful of the problem-solving tools for system improvement. Getting the most from Pareto analysis includes making subdivisions, multi-perspective analyses, and repeat analyses.
Subdivisions are useful when data has been first recorded at a very general level, but problem solving needs to occur at a more specific level. A retail chain manager might create a Pareto diagram for all the customer returns of furniture by store in his district. Once he or she has identified the store which contributes most returns to the total, the next step might be to analyze that store’s returns by furniture type. If “chairs” turned up as the biggest category of furniture returns for the store in question, yet another Pareto of chair returns might help to discover whether dining room chairs, occasional chairs, wooden chairs, or upholstered chairs were being returned more frequently. Because the Pareto principle holds for subgroupings of data, such successive analyses can be performed to help teams target small elements of a large problem.
Multi-perspective analyses are useful when data can be stratified or subdivided in several different ways. The retail manager might study customer returns of furniture by number of units and again by cost. A store might discover that chairs have accounted for the majority of items returned over a period of time, but that fine dining sets accounted for the majority of cost. Depending on priority, the problem could be attacked to reduce either the highest frequency or the highest cost item. The district retail manager might study his or her district-wide furniture returns by store, by lot number, by furniture type, by cause for return, by frequency, by cost, by salesperson, by delivery carrier, or by any other set of categories he or she thinks may reveal opportunities for improvement. Multi-perspective Pareto analysis helps assure that a set of data is reviewed from all angles and that many explanations for variability are considered.
Repeat analyses are useful when improvement activity is underway and performance data is changing over time. If the retail manager worked with the store’s delivery staff to reduce the number of fine dining sets being damaged and subsequently returned, it would be useful to repeat an earlier Pareto analysis using more recent data to see if the target category has shrunk. Depending on the cycle of data collection—hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, or other—repeated Pareto analyses help to monitor the improvements made to the system producing the data.
Caution is in order for users of Pareto analysis who have not monitored the systems they are studying for stability. A wildly fluctuating system will produce inconsistent Pareto rankings that can lead to misjudgments. If, for example, the retail manager failed to note that customer furniture returns varied greatly from month to month, the ranking of categories may be entirely different in a month with high returns from those of a month in which returns were unusually low. Repeated Pareto analyses can help to confirm rankings, but the most effective protection against being misled is to first use a control chart to tell if the system is stable and predictable.
Additional reference material
Additional sections from legacy pareto-data:
Pareto data
What is it?
If your counts data can be arranged into categories and the rank of each category is important it is considered Pareto data. Pareto analysis is based on the law of the significant few versus the trivial many. For example there are often many causes to a problem but only some of them are significant.
How is it used?
The purpose of a Pareto diagram is to separate the significant aspects of a problem from the trivial ones. By graphically separating the aspects of a problem, a team will know where to direct its improvement efforts. Reducing the largest bars identified in the diagram will do more for overall improvement than reducing the smaller ones. You can use a Pareto diagram to see frequency of occurrence or to compare cost and occurrence. Software packages such as SQCpack can generate Pareto diagrams from your data.
Use a Pareto diagram to analyze this type of data.
How is it used?
The purpose of a Pareto diagram is to separate the significant aspects of a problem from the trivial ones. By graphically separating the aspects of a problem, a team will know where to direct its improvement efforts. Reducing the largest bars identified in the diagram will do more for overall improvement than reducing the smaller ones. You can use a Pareto diagram to see frequency of occurrence or to compare cost and occurrence. Software packages such as SQCpack can generate Pareto diagrams from your data.
Use a Pareto diagram to analyze this type of data.
Additional sections from legacy pareto-chart:
What is a Pareto Chart?
Pareto charts display defect codes and causes in a simple, easy-to-understand bar chart. But don’t let their simplicity fool you—these charts can be useful statistical process control (SPC) analysis controls.
A traditional use of a Pareto chart like the one shown here would be to count and categorize the types of potential defects that result from a visual inspection of an engine. You can see from this example that the defect “Incorrect Torque” is most prevalent.
Multilevel Pareto Charts
InfinityQS® software takes this chart technology to the next level by supporting multilevel Pareto charts—up to 10 levels deep.
InfinityQS has turned the pedestrian Pareto chart into a robust, sophisticated analysis tool that allows sorting and display of defect codes any way you want—by shift, customer code, employee, lot number, part, time, and more. Any information associated with defect data can be sorted, sliced, and diced.
The two-level Pareto chart shown here includes the same defects as the previous chart but re-sorts the data by engine serial number (yellow bars), then by defect code (blue bars). Clearly the most prevalent defect is “Incorrect Torque,” but the re-sorting reveals additional information including:
- The engine serial number where the most defects were found
- The total number of defects for each engine
- The type of defects found on each individual engine serial number
- The fact that not all engines include “Incorrect Torque” defects
In our free webinar Box Plots and Pareto Charts, you’ll learn how to gain the greatest benefit from these tools. You’ll learn best practices, how to easily analyze data, and how to use weighting to monetize quality issues.
Multilevel Pareto Charts
InfinityQS® software takes this chart technology to the next level by supporting multilevel Pareto charts—up to 10 levels deep.
InfinityQS has turned the pedestrian Pareto chart into a robust, sophisticated analysis tool that allows sorting and display of defect codes any way you want—by shift, customer code, employee, lot number, part, time, and more. Any information associated with defect data can be sorted, sliced, and diced.
The two-level Pareto chart shown here includes the same defects as the previous chart but re-sorts the data by engine serial number (yellow bars), then by defect code (blue bars). Clearly the most prevalent defect is “Incorrect Torque,” but the re-sorting reveals additional information including:
- The engine serial number where the most defects were found
- The total number of defects for each engine
- The type of defects found on each individual engine serial number
- The fact that not all engines include “Incorrect Torque” defects
In our free webinar Box Plots and Pareto Charts, you’ll learn how to gain the greatest benefit from these tools. You’ll learn best practices, how to easily analyze data, and how to use weighting to monetize quality issues.
Automate and Simplify Control Chart Analysis
See how easy it is to access actionable information from your SPC control charts.
Automate and Simplify Control Chart Analysis
See how easy it is to access actionable information from your SPC control charts.
See the Pareto Chart in Action
With the power of multilevel Pareto charts,InfinityQS solutions make it simple to identify and prioritize your most important quality improvement activities.
See how InfinityQS reveals valuable quality information and makes SPC easy.
See the Pareto Chart in Action
With the power of multilevel Pareto charts,InfinityQS solutions make it simple to identify and prioritize your most important quality improvement activities.
See how InfinityQS reveals valuable quality information and makes SPC easy.
Speak to a Manufacturing Industry Expert
What to Expect
- Free 20-minute call with a product expert
- Explore which solutions best suit your needs
- No-pressure conversation
- Get a live, personalized demo
Speak to a Manufacturing Industry Expert
What to Expect
- Free 20-minute call with a product expert
- Explore which solutions best suit your needs
- No-pressure conversation
- Get a live, personalized demo
Customers using Advantive in quality advisor
“Enact helps us quickly respond to quality issues, which saves us money.”
““What sets Ben & Jerry’s apart from our competitors is not only our insistence on high-quality ingredients, but also the extra and unique flavours we use to create a euphoric customer experience. Ensuring the final product reflects the passion and quality that we put into each pint required a quality solution that emphasized the same attention to details that we do.””
““By utilizing InfinityQS® ProFicient™ to implement SPC and Six Sigma best practices across our manufacturing processes, Ben & Jerry’s will continue to identify opportunities for cost savings and ensure the highest level of customer satisfaction. The result is the perfect pint for our customers.””